According to Queen Telegraph, Casa Founder and Encoder Jameson Loeb noted that the custodian had recently rewritten its backend infrastructure to support Electrum based on the tests. >
The company has chosen three different server applications to test: Electrum X, Electra, and Esplora Electronics. It also removed three other servers, Electrum's server, Electrum's personal server and Bitcoin wallet tracker because they felt it was not designed to achieve high performance.
For the sake of the test, Loeb said, Casa wanted to understand the performance characteristics of each implementation. They managed a list of 103,000 titles with more than 100 transactions as the test data set. On the first run test alone, I found that one of the server options could already be excluded.
As the field narrowed to two, Loeb said they had switched to a performance test. Here, they found that Electrom X only took more than 20 milliseconds to return the transaction log compared to the Esplora speed of hundreds of milliseconds for simpler queries.
However, for the larger and more sophisticated companies, especially those with high unspent bitcoin transactions, Esplora was the brilliance. Where Casa saw that Esplora was able to expand well.
Loeb said: In general, Electrum X seems to provide the best solution for Bitcoin in terms of performance versus resource requirements. But if you're ready to set aside 10 times the disk space for maximum performance, an Esplora is the right way.
