The big question before the global economy appears now is ... What end will the trade negotiations between the United States of America and China produce ?! ... the contradictory statements made by the two sides at best suggest a partial, short-term agreement that is inconclusive or binding ... First, US President Donald Trump has been promoting since the beginning of the year good trade negotiations with China, while he has stopped his clear and explicit accusations that he used to direct to China. ... but Trump's reactions since the start of the armistice signaled more failure than actual success through ... 1- The increase in the US trade deficit in the year of the trade war 2018 by about 12%, to reach about $ 621 billion, including $ 323 billion with China only. 2 - No official statement has emerged from the four rounds of negotiations in Washington and Beijing, while statements by Trump administration members have contradicted the president’s optimism ... that the agreement Within miles, according to US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, that Washington will lose in its damaging trade war against China, according to the recent statement by Ghazi Cohen, a former White House economic adviser 3 - Trump did not commit himself to the armistice imposed by the ninety days, which ended March 1st and said about it that it is not a sacred date and open the term for an indefinite period by installing Customs tariffs on Chinese imports are at 10% ... and no executive order has been issued yet from the US administration to ban the use of Chinese communication equipment, such as Huawei, despite the fierce international campaign launched by Washington seven months ago 4 - Trump failed for the second time in a row to hold a summit meeting with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping, by coming up with a final agreement in the trade war and postponing the meeting from February As the Trump-Kim summit failed to March and from April to the hope of a meeting that may not take place in the first half of this year ... and Trump's return to saying either a good agreement or not ...
Second, China appears more balanced in dealing with matters than showing its openness to negotiations and adherence to its gains and commercial interests, just as the US side adheres to, despite the wounds it sustained in the trade war in exchange for the positive changes it brought about through ...
